What Does Quaddafi, The Nation of Islam, and Violent Street Gangs have in Common?

Glenn Beck asked the question why won't Obama mention Qaddafi by name? Or why Obama is dragging his feet when it comes to Qaddafi. Simple, they have worked together for many years. Anyone remember Jeff Fort and the Black Stone Nation out of Chicago? They are a group of racist radicals who were convicted in 1986 for receiving money from Qaddafi to create terror here in the USA.

Here are some of the answers:

Weapons of Mass Insurrection

The Lies and Insanity of the Neo-Libs


Both Edwards and Hilary both stated that they would support the troops and would not cut off funding. That is exactly what they both did when they voted no on giving our military money for ammunition. Selfish liars are what they are!!

They would rather surrender, retreat, and bring the fight to America simply for political points. Hilary has no excuse!! How in the world can she say the Bush lied about WMD’s when her own husband attacked Iraq for the exact same reason. This was one of the reasons she herself gave when she voted for the war.

If this doesn’t show her lack of integrity, nothing will. That and her refusal to support the troops after she voted to put them there to begin with. Edwards and Gore are guilty of this as well. Obama has said that he was against the war, but since he is still a rookie senator, nobody really knows for sure where he stood. It is possible that as a muslim who has an early education in extreme muslims schools, that he was against the war, but what side is he on when it comes to the global picture? Is he going to be one of the crazies that wanted to go and “talk” with bin lauden after 9/11 and broker peace with those who attacked us??

I could never vote any of these people in office. I am not a gambler and will not put the safety of my son and the rest of America’s children at risk. They are all such wild cards, you never know what they truly believe or what they will actually do in office.

They are anti-Christian and pro muslim. They are pro aclu and pro UN. Both the aclu and un are corrupt. The one is suing the Government so that NAMBLA (north American man boy love assoc.) can rape more of our kids and the UN’s corruption are well known, I don’t have to belabor the point.

This is the group that is running Vermont and are letting child rapist off with probation or at the most 6 months for raping our children!!

This is the group that taught in a Boulder, Co High School in a required assembly that they should participate in illegal drug activities, homosexual behavior, and unprotected sex. Not only were they told that these things were ok and acceptable, but the children were “encouraged” to participate in such behavior.

Is this really the best the left has to offer? No, I do not believe so. They have got to have at least one level headed candidate that puts the lives of Americans over themselves, we just voted many more into office, there has to be one…………………

Traditional Democrats and Neo-Libs

There is a difference between the two. One is an extreme group of radicals who are wanting to turn our country into a socialist country, the neo-libs, and the other are traditional dems who are wanting the best for our country.

Traditional Democrats

These are the Democrats who have their own convictions and their own heads, the hold on to their traditional values and beliefs.

They are the ones who use a level headed approach and they take in consideration every aspect involved their decisions. These are the 86 who voted for giving the military what they need so that our men and women who are defending our country are not in further danger than they already are.

These are the ones who are reaching across the aisle in order to work together for the good of the entire country. They are willing to compromise and they fight for what is right, not what they are told to fight for.

Neo-Libs

They have rejected all of their traditional values. These are the ones who will do or say anything for political points.

This includes putting our fighting men and women in Iraq and then voting against funding them. Do they really care so little about the lives of our servicemen and women that they will have many more of them killed because they did not have the ammunition to protect themselves? Does their political career mean more to them than the thousands of lives that would have been lost because of their “my way or no way” attitude?

To Sum it Up

These are the definitions I will be using in my blog from now on. It is not my wish to offend the many moderate democrats while at the same time writing against the dangerous politics of the far left. Make no mistake, they are dangerous as I will show in future writings.